Comments on: On Sleepwear http://www.stlworkingmom.com/2007/03/09/on-sleepwear/ One working mom's survival guide, parental ponderings and frustrating failures. Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:09:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Kristin http://www.stlworkingmom.com/2007/03/09/on-sleepwear/#comment-1565 Kristin Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:29:19 +0000 http://www.stlworkingmom.com/?p=396#comment-1565 My fav is No. 1. My fav is No. 1.

]]> By: Cory Capron http://www.stlworkingmom.com/2007/03/09/on-sleepwear/#comment-643 Cory Capron Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:49:38 +0000 http://www.stlworkingmom.com/?p=396#comment-643 "I would have expected a comment brushfire but even Dwight held his, uh, tongue." Sorry, been offline. Gown #1: Breasts on Stilts Girl attacks Tokyo! RUN! For some reason I’ve never liked dresses/gowns that are basically a skirt up to the bra line. This one makes the woman kinda look like a giant pair of legs. On the plus side it’s probably comfy. My girlfriend is a seamstress and makes all her own dresses, which have included a few exceptions to this rule. Gown #2: Lady in Red I agree. It seems to cover all the bases you mentioned. It’s very attractive, doesn’t look uncomfortable (depends on the fabric though), and very, very RED. The only thing left to question is whether or not you want to be wearing it outside if your house is on fire. Gown #3: Curtain Granny Mannequin Antoinette No comment needed. Gown #4: The Slicin’ Dicin’ Booby-Mincer! Could a good rule of thumb be that any gown that is modeled outside of somewhere that looks like the set of an 11oclock Skin-a-max feature be considered trashy? I mean, I wouldn’t have even guessed that was a gown. I was briefly afraid that Tony Scott was remaking Taxi Driver and that was his replacement for Jodie Foster! As much as women over-worry about stretch marks, I fail to see how anyone could think this a good idea. Gown #5: Easy-Bake Lovin’ Other than the “little-girly” factor there’s not really anything wrong with these, but if you are the worn shorts and shirt type… it might make for a toasty transition. Might be nice come winter though. Whatever you decide on, priority one should be comfort. Most guys should agree where the scales should lean when faced with a cranky to sexy correlation. As for running outside… that’s what bathrobes are for. “I would have expected a comment brushfire but even Dwight held his, uh, tongue.”

Sorry, been offline.

Gown #1: Breasts on Stilts Girl attacks Tokyo! RUN!

For some reason I’ve never liked dresses/gowns that are basically a skirt up to the bra line. This one makes the woman kinda look like a giant pair of legs. On the plus side it’s probably comfy. My girlfriend is a seamstress and makes all her own dresses, which have included a few exceptions to this rule.

Gown #2: Lady in Red

I agree. It seems to cover all the bases you mentioned. It’s very attractive, doesn’t look uncomfortable (depends on the fabric though), and very, very RED. The only thing left to question is whether or not you want to be wearing it outside if your house is on fire.

Gown #3: Curtain Granny Mannequin Antoinette

No comment needed.

Gown #4: The Slicin’ Dicin’ Booby-Mincer!

Could a good rule of thumb be that any gown that is modeled outside of somewhere that looks like the set of an 11oclock Skin-a-max feature be considered trashy? I mean, I wouldn’t have even guessed that was a gown. I was briefly afraid that Tony Scott was remaking Taxi Driver and that was his replacement for Jodie Foster!

As much as women over-worry about stretch marks, I fail to see how anyone could think this a good idea.

Gown #5: Easy-Bake Lovin’

Other than the “little-girly” factor there’s not really anything wrong with these, but if you are the worn shorts and shirt type… it might make for a toasty transition. Might be nice come winter though.

Whatever you decide on, priority one should be comfort. Most guys should agree where the scales should lean when faced with a cranky to sexy correlation. As for running outside… that’s what bathrobes are for.

]]> By: marijean http://www.stlworkingmom.com/2007/03/09/on-sleepwear/#comment-616 marijean Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:03:09 +0000 http://www.stlworkingmom.com/?p=396#comment-616 I can't believe it. I would have expected a comment brushfire but even Dwight held his, uh, tongue. I can’t believe it. I would have expected a comment brushfire but even Dwight held his, uh, tongue.

]]> By: Dwight the Troubled Teen http://www.stlworkingmom.com/2007/03/09/on-sleepwear/#comment-615 Dwight the Troubled Teen Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:29:00 +0000 http://www.stlworkingmom.com/?p=396#comment-615 Oh, exhale! I'm not going to say a darn thing, even if it kills me to hold it in. Oh, exhale! I’m not going to say a darn thing, even if it kills me to hold it in.

]]>